News Feature
NCD #02-380
August 13, 2002
Contact: Mark S. Quigley
202-272-2004
202-272-2074 TTY
mquigley@ncd.gov
National Council on Disability Feature: People
with Disabilities Need Assistive Technology
WASHINGTON-The National Council on Disability (NCD)
released its 2001 annual National Disability Policy: A Progress
Report, on July 26, 2002. The report addresses several important
issues related to people with disabilities. This feature highlights
a number of issues related to assistive technology and telecommunications,
including access to both and the status of statutory and regulatory
provisions designed to advance their utilization by people with
disabilities.
The New Freedom Initiative and Assistive Technology
The President's "New Freedom Initiative" (NFI) places great emphasis
on the development and deployment of assistive technology (AT).
The focus includes major commitments to research through the National
Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR), expansion
of resources available for AT loans to individuals with disabilities
under the Alternative Financing Program (AFP) of Title III of the
Assistive Technology Act, and commitments to a number of innovative
programs, such as the use of technology to develop home-based entrepreneurship
and employment opportunities, and the importance of technology in
the implementation of the Olmstead decision. NCD welcomes these
initiatives and recommends that the Administration continue taking
the steps needed to ensure their fulfillment, including: (a) coordination
of efforts among agencies with overlapping jurisdiction; (b) ongoing
provision of technical assistance to states and other partners;
(c) temporary elimination of the state matching requirements for
the AFP until states are on better fiscal footing; (d) clarification
of applicable income tax rules and Social Security income and resources
limitations to avoid possible disincentives to work; (e) NIDRR research
that includes a focus on universal design; and, (f) a comprehensive
study of the role the health care system should play in the provision,
funding and development of AT.
Implementation of Section 508
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1998 has been praised as
the most far-reaching universal design statute ever enacted. This
law requires federal agencies to adhere to the principles of "accessibility"
to persons with disabilities in their purchase and use of electronic
and information technology (E&IT). The law's purpose is to ensure
that access to technology such as computers, photocopiers, audiovisual
training materials, and Web sites is equal for federal employees
and members of the public with and without disabilities. In those
cases in which achievement of accessibility constitutes an undue
burden, the agencies are not required to obtain accessible technology,
but they are still required to develop alternative means for making
information available to government employees or members of the
public with disabilities.
Section 508 has been in effect since late June 2001.
The principle implementation questions thus far relate to the lack
of adequate compliance monitoring. While the U.S. Department of
Justice (DOJ) has taken on biannual performance measurements, no
monitoring procedures are in place to determine the frequency with
which agencies invoke "undue burden" defense (or any other authorized
exceptions) nor are there procedures in place for evaluating the
soundness of such claims. NCD first recommended that this issue
be addressed in its June 2001 report, The Accessible Future. NCD
again recommends that the Administration institute procedures for
collecting and tracking the undue burden claims. NCD also recommends
that the Administration issue a Request for Information to agency
Chief Information Officers and others, seeking comprehensive information
on all problems arising with implementation of Section 508. And,
finally, NCD recommends that information on implementation and compliance
issues be included in DOJ's report to the President and Congress.
Technical Assistance and Outreach
NCD has recommended in the past that the U.S. General Services Administration
ensure the creation of tools to measure accessibility and to evaluate
vendor accessibility claims for all covered forms of E&IT. Evaluation
tools are needed to determine accessibility standards, usability,
and time required for accessing Web-based information, or the performance
by persons with and without disabilities of interactive tasks on
the Web. NCD recommends rigorous testing by federal agencies of
devices under realistic and real-time conditions. Wherever possible,
agencies should use the services of people with disabilities who
are knowledgeable about the equipment to help conduct these tests.
Technology-Based Civil Rights
Section 508 confers a right for federal employees or members of
the public to file a civil rights complaint or bring suit for its
violation. The number and types of suits and complaints brought
will provide important insight into how well Section 508 is working.
NCD recommends that DOJ track such complaints in its biannual report.
NCD also recommends that DOJ address how it intends to handle situations
that could arise when it is both the holder of potentially damaging
information about a federal agency's noncompliance and the defender
of that agency in court.
Telecommuting
The NCD report makes no recommendations for AT and telecommuting,
but it does point out that while Section 508 does not cover access
to technology for private use away from federal facilities, when
the employee's home becomes his or her place of work, necessary
accommodations must be provided.
Distance Learning
In December, the National Web-based Education Commission conducted
an investigation of the key issues around the use of the Internet
for learning, including the necessity for ensuring that all learners
have equal access to the capabilities of the Web. NCD recommends
that the Administration review the report, formally indicate its
views concerning its findings and recommendations, and act to incorporate
the recommendations into policy.
The E-Rate
The "e-rate" program is designed to make Internet access and telecommunications
services more affordable for schools and libraries by subsidizing
the rate they pay for such services. While the question has not
yet been addressed in court, the history and interpretations by
DOJ and the Federal Acquisition Regulations Council (FARC) of related
provisions lead to the conclusion that the e-rate program is covered
by Section 508. However, no steps have been taken to ensure that
this program is accessible. The NCD Report points out, "As long
as people with disabilities pay the surcharges that fund the e-rate,
it is unthinkable that they or their children should be denied its
benefits."
Section 255
Section 255 of the Federal Communications Act requires that providers
of telecommunications services (such as local and long distance
phone companies) and manufacturers of telecommunications equipment
and customer premises equipment must make their products and services
accessible and usable by individuals with disabilities, where it
is readily achievable to do so. The Report points out the need for
more aggressive implementation of Section 255 regulatory requirements,
including an indication by the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) about the future of the Market Monitoring Report (MMR). If
the MMR is no longer considered to be a valuable information resource
and appropriate tool in the enforcement of Section 255, FCC should
indicate how it proposes to gather broad based compliance information
in the future. If FCC believes this to be a viable tool, the publication
of the report should be revived.
Telecommunications Versus Information Services
Because by law the term "telecommunications services" applies only
to services that facilitate and carry voice communication, other
information services such as e-mail and high-speed data transmission
are not technically covered under Section 255. FCC has asserted
the regulatory right to broaden the definition of covered telecommunications
services, and has indeed created an "adjunct to basic services"
category that applies Section 255 to all the features and functions
necessary to complete calls. This includes calls used for e-mail,
fax, data, and graphics transmission, in addition to activities
around traditional voice calls. FCC has sought input from industry
and the public regarding the need to even further broaden the scope
of Section 255. NCD recommends that FCC act quickly to apply Section
255 to the additional information services that are now staples
of the American information society. Additionally, NCD recommends
that Congress take care to ensure that existing civil rights protections
of Section 255 are not jeopardized when considering telecommunications
deregulation legislation.
E-Government
E-government refers to citizen-government interactions through the
use of E&IT. It has grown rapidly and is the modality of choice
for carrying out a growing array of governmental functions. The
NCD Report discusses the obvious challenges facing individuals with
disabilities when e-government activities are not totally accessible
to and usable by them. The issues become complicated when government
partners with state, non-profit, or for-profit sector entities who
should be expected to comply with civil rights laws, but for whom
the law might not be clear. Because of the number of technical issues
involved, the process of implementing e-civil rights must begin
with DOJ and an assessment of the current scope of federal authority
and responsibility. The NCD Report suggests that to the degree accessibility
requirements are determined to be applicable to e-government partners,
agencies should include appropriate notices and requirements in
their regulations, bid solicitations, contracts, grants, etc.
The Intellectual Property and Civil Rights Conflict
in Cyberspace
As early as 1931, statutory provisions were made for the transcription
of books into braille by the Library of Congress for distribution
through the nation's library system for persons who are blind and,
more recently, who experience other reading disabilities. In 1996,
the Copyright Act was amended to allow for the reproduction of all
published books in specialized formats by a variety of nonprofit
organizations. Safeguards are in place to protect the copyright
holders from damaging the economic rights, including bans on distribution
of the material for money. As we have moved into cyberspace recent
legal struggles over accessibility of e-books has created new barriers
to accessible books. NCD recommends that the Library of Congress
make a determination regarding the means, if any, by which electronic
publications provided in inaccessible formats can legally be made
accessible to individuals with disabilities.
Wireless Access for Users of Hearing Aids
The Hearing Aid Compatibility Act of 1988 exempted mobile phones
from hearing aid compatibility requirements applicable to other
phones. The Act instructed the FCC to periodically review this exemption.
FCC has issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) which will
signal the beginning of a full inquiry into the current potential
for mobile phone compatibility with hearing aids. The NCD Report
indicates the NPRM makes it possible for a FCC determination that
the exemption is no longer warranted and for the establishment of
a meaningful timetable for bringing cellular phones into full compliance
with accessibility provisions for other telephones.
Assistive Technology Act Reauthorization
The Assistive Technology Act, providing for state-based assistive
technology programs of advocacy, systems change, public awareness,
and technical assistance, was scheduled to "sunset" at the end of
FY 2001. Congress postponed the end through September 30, 2002,
and must soon determine if it will continue the Act. NCD recommends
that this Act be reauthorized, and points out the specific importance
of continuing the protection and advocacy provisions in the law.
For more information, contact Mark Quigley or Martin
Gould at 202-272-2004.
# # #
Source: National Disability Policy: A Progress Report,
December 2000-December 2001
Q://ncd/newsroom/publications/progressreport_07-26-02.html
|