News Release
NCD #03-412
April 29, 2003
Contact: Mark S. Quigley
202-272-2004
202-272-2074 TTY
mquigley@ncd.gov
National Council on Disability Addresses Supreme
Court's Americans with Disabilities Act Decisions and Substantial
Limitation of Major Life Activities
WASHINGTON--The National Council on Disability (NCD)
today released a policy brief, The Supreme Court's ADA Decisions
Regarding Substantial Limitation of Major Life Activities. It examines
the meaning and significance of the concepts of "substantial limitation"
and "major life activities," what the Supreme Court has said about
them, the implications of the Court's declarations, and how the
lower courts have handled questions about substantial limitation
on major life activities (http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/limitation.html).
The Supreme Court of the United States has made several
decisions that affect the interpretation of the requirement in the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) that, to qualify as a disability
under the Act, a condition must substantially limit one or more
major life activities. While a few of the Court's statements regarding
that requirement may prove beneficial to certain plaintiffs in future
cases, the overall effect of the Court's decisions has been to make
it more difficult to establish a substantial limitation on a major
life activity. At times, the Court has engaged in a wholesale rewriting
of the standards for determining what constitutes a substantial
limitation on a major life activity, often at odds with the actual
language of the ADA and even with the Court's prior rulings.
NCD will address some limitations the Court has imposed
on the remedies available in ADA cases and take a cross-issue look
at the consequences of the Supreme Court's decisions by contrasting
the state of the law before it rendered the decisions with the legal
situation after the decisions, to identify undesirable and unjust
outcomes in the decisions of the lower courts as a result of the
Supreme Court's rulings.
In future papers in this series, NCD will examine
various specific substantive aspects of the Court's rulings that
have weakened or restricted the impact of the ADA. NCD will then
develop legislative proposals for addressing those issues that appear
appropriate for legislative correction, and present those proposals,
along with pertinent supportive material from the previous papers
in this series in a final, comprehensive report entitled Righting
the ADA.
|