What's New

Members and Staff

Newsletter

Listserv

Publications

Quarterly Meetings

Lessons Learned


Contact Information:
National Council on Disability
1331 F Street, NW,
Suite 850
Washington, DC 20004

202-272-2004 Voice
202-272-2074 TTY
202-272-2022 Fax


Comments and Feedback:
ncd@ncd.gov


Get Adobe Acrobat Reader to view PDF files

Go to the U.S. Government's Official Web Portal

Visit DisabilityInfo.gov

 
 

Newsroom

 
UNDERSTANDING DISABILITIES IN AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE COMMUNITIES: TOOLKIT GUIDE

August 1, 2003

National Council on Disability
1331 F Street, NW, Suite 850
Washington, DC 20004


This report is also available in alternative formats and on NCD's award-winning Web site at www.ncd.gov

Publication date: August 1, 2003

202-272-2004 Voice
202-272-2074 TTY
202-272-2022 Fax

The views contained in this report do not necessarily represent those of the Administration as this and all NCD reports are not subject to the A-19 Executive Branch review process.


About the Cover

The four symbols on the cover of the Toolkit Guide were chosen to represent the spectrum of disabilities, whether visible or hidden, that may be experienced by individuals in the American Indian and Alaska Native community. The universal meaning of each symbol is described in the captions below along with the meaning of the symbol as it is used in this Toolkit specifically.

Access for People Who Are Blind or Have Low Vision (blind with cane)

Universally, this symbol identifies areas that are specifically designed to be accessible to or in some cases tailored to the unique abilities of individuals who are blind or have low vision. Within the Toolkit, this symbol is used to represent the community of individuals for whom sight is not a primary sensory tool.

Mobility Access Symbol (wheelchair)

The wheelchair symbol indicates access for individuals who have a mobility disability, including individuals who use wheelchairs. The symbol is most commonly used to indicate an accessible entrance, bathroom, or environment that is sensitive to individuals with specific mobility access needs. Within the Toolkit, this symbol is simply used to represent the community of individuals with mobility needs of this kind.

Communication Access for People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing (signing hands)

This symbol typically indicates that sign language interpretation is provided for a lecture, tour, performance, conference, or other program. Within the Toolkit, the symbol is used to represent the community of individuals whose primary means of communication is sign language.

Hidden Disabilities (face beneath face)

This symbol was designed specifically for the Toolkit after the Technical Expert Panel determined that there were currently only universal symbols for disabilities that are seen, leaving out the experiences of individuals with epilepsy, developmental disabilities, alcoholism, mental illness, learning difficulties, diabetes, and others who are not represented by the universal disability symbols. The symbol was inspired by the art of many indigenous cultures that designed faces with multiple overlaid masks. This symbol represents the community of individuals who have disabilities that are not externally visible but significantly impact an individual's life.

Acknowledgments

The National Council on Disability's (NCD) Understanding Disabilities in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: Toolkit Guide was developed through the passionate collaboration of many individuals. The foundation of this project was formed in a powerful sharing of experiences, knowledge, and hopes among consumers and advocates who live with disabilities. These individuals strived to create a new perspective about what it means to be an American Indian or an Alaska Native with a disability. This new consciousness will serve to transform Indian communities nationally and offer a new hope to so many individuals who for so long have felt invisible with no voice.

NCD expresses its gratitude to the team at Kauffman and Associates, Inc., for drafting this toolkit. Team members include Project Director Dr. Martina Whelshula, Victor Paternoster, Tim Spellman, Wendy Thompson, and Ara Walline.

Others who have greatly supported the development of this work and deserve special acknowledgment are Mike Blatchford, consultant; Kathy Langwell and Project HOPE; Desautel Hege Communications; Robert Shuckahosee, consultant; Frank Ryan, consultant; the Consortia of Administrators for Native American Rehabilitation (CANAR); the American Indian Disability Technical Assistance Center; the American Indian Rehabilitation Research Training Center; the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI); focus group participants at NCAI and CANAR conferences; and Judy Babbit from the City of San Antonio Disability Access Office.

A special acknowledgment goes to those who represent the heart and soul of this effort, our Technical Expert Panel members: Mark Azure, Julie Anna Clay, Julia Davis-Wheeler, LaDonna Fowler, Joanne Francis, Joseph Garcia, Cordia LaFontaine, Carol Locust, Danny Lucero, David Miles, Damara Paris, Andrea Siow, H. Sally Smith, Raho Williams, Alvin Windy Boy. Thanks also to Jessie Stewart, age 10, for sharing her story.

In attempts to understand the complex make-up of Indian country as it addresses the needs of tribal members and descendants with disabilities, tribal program directors shared willingly about the challenges and inspirations experienced in their work. NCD acknowledges these individuals and the tribes they represent: Jo White, Oglala Nation at Pine Ridge; Arlene Templer, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes; Rita LaFrance, St. Regis Mohawk; Rhonda Talaswaima, Hopi Nation; Darlene Finley, Three Affiliated Tribes; Linda Pratt, Yakama Nation; Larry Alflen, Pueblo of the Zuni; Steven "Corky" West, Oneida Nation; Ella Yazzie-King and Paula Seanez, Navajo Nation; and Len Whitebear, Cook Inlet Tribal Council.

Technical Expert Panel

Several individuals representing consumers and advocates within the American Indian and Alaska Native disability community nationwide were recommended to serve as members of a national Technical Expert Panel. The Technical Expert Panel served as project consultants and advisors providing guidance to the staff on the direction of the project. The Panel was instrumental in providing critical feedback and direction on the multitude of issues addressed throughout the development of this toolkit. The Technical Expert Panel members are as follows:

Mark Azure
Tsimshian/Hunkpapa Lakota
Intertribal Deaf Council
Consumer

Julie Anna Clay
Omaha Tribe
Training and Dissemination Coordinator
American Indian Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (AIRRTC)
Consumer

Julia Davis-Wheeler
Nez Perce
Nez Perce Tribal Council
Chair, National Indian Health Board

LaDonna Fowler
Turtle Mountain Chippewa/Santee Sioux/Assiniboine
Chairperson, Subcommittee on Disability, National Congress of American Indians
Co-Founder, American Indian Rehabilitation Rights Organization of Warriors (AIRROW)

National Board Member, AIRRTC
Secretary, Multicultural Committee, National Council on Independent Living
Co-Secretary, Native American Alliance for Independent Living
Charter Member, Cultural Diversity Advisory Committee for National Council on Disability
Native American Disability Consultant/Consumer

Joanne Francis
Akwesasne Mohawk
International Disability Consultant
Founding Member, AIRROW
Consumer

Joseph Garcia
Prairie Band of Potawatomi
Board Member - American Indian
Disability Technical Assistance Center<> Student, Salish Kootenai College
Consumer

Cordia LaFontaine
Consumer

Carol Locust
Eastern Band Cherokee
Indian Health Services Health Consultant
Cultural Sensitivity Trainer & Consultant
Consumer

Danny Lucero
Navajo/Apache Nations
Vice President, Intertribal Deaf Council
Gallaudet University
Consumer

David Miles
Nez Perce Tribe
Director, Nez Perce Vocational Rehabilitation Services
Board Member for the Idaho State Independent Living Council
Board Member for the Idaho State Rehabilitation Council

Damara Paris
Cherokee
President, Intertribal Deaf Council
Consumer

Andrea Siow
Hopi Nation
Consumer

H. Sally Smith
Tribal Leader
Alaska Native Health Board
National Indian Health Board

Raho Williams
Navajo Nation
Independent Living Specialist
San Juan Center for Independence
Consumer

Alvin Windy Boy
Chippewa-Cree
Tribal Leader
Rocky Boy Reservation

Contents

Welcome to the Toolkit

    How many Indians live on tribal lands?
    Did you know at least 555,000 Indians live with disabilities?
    What is a disability?
    What disabilities do we find in Indian communities?
    Barriers and Challenges
    References

Healthy Living

    Background
    Health Care

      Indian Health Service
      Medicaid
      Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS)
      Medicare
      State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)
    Sports & Recreation
    References

Education

    Background
    Federal Special Education Law

      Individualized Education Programs
      Tips for Parents at IEP Meetings
      IEP Checklist
      Problem Solving
    Office of Special Education Programs
      Strategic Direction 1
      Strategic Direction 2
      Strategic Direction 3
      Strategic Direction 4
      Strategic Direction 5
      OSEP-Sponsored Resources
      IDEA Partnerships
    Technical Assistance Alliance for Parent Centers
    Technical Assistance and Dissemination Network-Minorities
    References

Independent Living

    Background
    Model Approaches

      ASSIST! to Independence
      Native American Independent Living Services (NAILS)
      Native American Advocacy Project (NAAP)
    Resources
      Federal Funding for Independent Living Centers
      Statewide Independent Living Councils
      Local Independent Living Centers
      Independent Living Advocacy
    References

Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Resources

    Background
    VR Service and Employment Basics for the Consumer

      Qualifying for Vocational Rehabilitation Services
      Ticket to Work
      Employment Protections9
      How to File Complaints
    Consumer Disability Resources
      Mental Health
      Alcohol and Substance Abuse
      Spinal Cord Injury
      Traumatic Brain Injury
    Tribal VR Program Resources
    References

Assistive Technology

    Background
    Model Approaches
      ASSIST! to Independence
      Native American Advocacy Project (NAAP)
      Resources
    State Assistive Technology Financial Loan Programs and Other Loan
    Programs Serving Native Americans
    General Assistive Technology Resources Available to Native Americans
    Assistive Technology Advocacy
    References

Housing and Facilities

    Background
      Barriers to Service
      The Basics of Universal Design
      Assessing Service Needs
    Model Approaches
    Making Plans a Reality
    Frequently Asked Questions
    References

Transportation

    Background
      Barriers to Service
      Assessing Service Needs
      Definitions
    Model Approaches
      Pueblo of the Zuni
      Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes
      Other Programs
    Making Plans a Reality
      Frequently Asked Questions
    References

Key Elements of Promising Programs

    Background
    Leadership
      Leadership Characteristics
      Responsiveness to the Needs of the Consumer
      Innovation in Removing Barriers
      Effective Collaboration
      Advocacy Strength
      Support from Tribal Leadership
    Conclusion

Advocating Change

    Self-Advocacy
      Self-Advocacy.What Is It?
    Giving Voice to Your Life Choices
    Speaking Up About Services
      Step 1: Targeting
      Step 2: Preparing
      Step 3: Influencing
      Step 4: Following Through
    What Would You Do As a Self-Advocate?
    GuidelinNational Initiatives, Federal Agencies, and National Organizations 153es for Writing a Resolution
      Purpose of Submitting a Resolution
      Resolution Format
    Sample Resolutions
    References

Federal Disability Laws and Tribes

    Background
    Understanding Government-to-Government Relationships
      The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Tribes
      The Rehabilitation Act and Tribes
      The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Tribes
    Advocacy
    References

 

    Background
    Initiatives
      New Freedom Initiative
    Federal Disability Agencies
      Social Security
      National Council on Disability (NCD)
      Department of Justice
      Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
      Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA)
      Department of the Interior

      Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD)
      Department of Labor
      Administration on Aging (AOA)
      Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
      Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
      Office of Special Education Rehabilitation Services (OSERS)
      Regional Rehabilitation Continuing Eduation Preograms (RRCEPs)
      Rural Utilities Service
      Small Business Administration (SBA)
      Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
      Administration for Native Americans (ANA)

    National Disability Organizations
    References

Disability Etiquette Handbook

    Dos and Don'ts
    Conversation Etiquette
    Glossary of Acceptable Terms
    Preparing for Sign Language Interpreters
      Resources Regarding Interpreters
    Service Animals
      What Is a Service Animal?
      Service Animal Access
      Service Animal Etiquette
      Service Animal Resources
    References

Welcome to the Toolkit

A powerful voice in Indian country has emerged, strongly pronouncing that American Indian people with disabilities do not need to be "cured" or "fixed." In truth, equal access, fair accommodations, and an opportunity to make powerful contributions to our society are needed.

By eliminating the barriers, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people with disabilities can work together in partnership to make tribal communities more accessible, more caring, and more representative of the beautiful, unique contributions each individual brings to this world.

Indian people with disabilities and tribal leaders who served together on a Technical Expert Panel for the National Council on Disability (NCD) designed this Toolkit. They hope that the information, encouragement, and resources found in this Toolkit will help you and your community create the awareness, support, encouragement, and empowerment to improve the lives of people with disabilities and their families.

In this Toolkit, you will find information about disabilities, Indian tribes, and resources. You will also find suggestions for improving services, providing protections, and tapping resources in local tribal communities for people with disabilities. This guide will focus primarily on health care, independent living, education, and vocational rehabilitation. In addition, resources are provided in the areas of housing and transportation.

Each section of the Toolkit will provide specific contact information by topic for organizations that may be of further assistance to you. Where possible, the narrative describing each organization's mission and role has been directly quoted from the organization's Web site, and the Web site address has been identified in order to provide the most accurate and useful information.

AI/AN people with disabilities, especially those who live in Indian country, face unique circumstances and legal environments that require special outreach, consultation, protections, and services. There is a great desire among AI/AN people with disabilities to work in partnership with sovereign tribal governments to make tribal communities and work places accessible and welcoming to people with disabilities.

How many Indians live on tribal lands?

According to the 2000 U.S. Census, nearly 2.5 million Americans identify themselves exclusively as "American Indian or Alaska Native." There are 4.1 million people who identify themselves either as Indian only or Indian in combination with another race (Ogunwole, 2002). Of this total, approximately 944,433 Indian or Alaska Native people live on federal reservations or on off-reservation trust lands (Langwell and Sutton, 2002). Of the 50 states, 35 have federal reservations within or overlapping state borders.

The Federal Government, through the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), officially recognizes 560 tribes and Alaska Native villages (Ogunwole, 2002). They are known as "Federally Recognized Tribes."

Did you know at least 550,000 Indians live with disabilities?

Data from the 1997 Survey of Income and Program Participation found that 22 percent of the American Indian and Alaska Native population has one or more disabilities (McNeil, 2001). This is the highest rate of disability when compared with all other races in the United States. The rate of disability varies significantly by race:

Race Percentage with Disabilities
U.S. all races  20%
White  20%
Black  20%
Hispanic  15%
Asian  10%
American Indian  22%

If we consider only the 2.5 million who reported on the 2000 census that they identify themselves exclusively as "American Indian or Alaska Native," this means that at least 550,000 Indians and Alaska Natives have disabilities.

What is a disability?

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) defines a disability as follows:

    The term "disability" means, with respect to an individual - (A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of such individual; (B) a record of such an impairment; or (C) being regarded as having such an impairment (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.).

Other, similar definitions are found in the Rehabilitation Act and the Social Security Act. You may find that eligibility for certain benefits, such as Social Security Income (SSI) for people with disabilities, may require a more rigorous definition. For example, the Social Security Act defines disability as follows:

    ...the term 'disability' means (A) inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, or (B) blindness . (42 U.S.C. 416 § 216 [42 U.S.C. 416] (1)(1))

While definitions vary, nearly all these definitions rely upon some measure of functional limitation to determine severity. This is done using activities of daily living (ADL) or instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

    ADL include eating, walking, using the toilet, dressing, bathing, and getting in/out of bed.

    IADL include cooking, shopping, managing money, using a phone, doing light or heavy housework, and getting out of the home.

Assessing the severity of a disability is done by totaling the number of ADL or IADL experienced by an individual (NRCNAA, 2002).

What disabilities do we find in Indian communities?

Every type of disability that is found in the general population can also be found in the AI/AN population. Several small studies have surveyed tribal communities to identify most frequent types of disabilities. These studies (Clay, 1992; Rural Institute on Disabilities, 1995; AIDLP, 2000) generally found that the following types of disabilities are most often reported in Indian community surveys:

  • Spinal cord injury (see Vocational Rehabilitation [VR] section for more information)
  • Diabetes complications
  • Blindness
  • Mobility disability
  • Traumatic brain injury (see VR section for more information)
  • Deafness or hardness of hearing
  • Orthopedic conditions
  • Arthralgia
  • Emotional or mental health conditions (see VR section for more information)
  • Learning disabilities
  • Alcoholism or drug dependence (see VR section for more information)

Not all disabilities are easily seen or can be seen at all. Many individuals have hidden or unseen disabilities, such as emotional or mental health problems, learning disabilities, alcohol/drug dependence, or deafness. Some people are born with their disability, or develop the disability early in life. Other people acquire their disability later in life as a result of disease, age, or injury.

If we live long enough, we will each experience life with a disability.

Barriers and Challenges

Attitude: Most nondisabled people do not understand people with disabilities. Too often we see the disability and not the person. This is also true in our AI/AN communities. You can help change this!

Lack of Awareness: There is a lack of understanding about the number of Indians with disabilities, the types of disabilities in Indian communities, and the various opportunities our tribal government and service programs have to better protect and assist people with disabilities in Indian country.

Legal Enforcement Unclear: Federal laws designed to protect people with disabilities are not always enforceable against tribal governments because of the sovereign immunity and sovereign status of tribal governments. This does not mean that all enterprises located on tribal lands are exempt from federal laws, only that tribal governments are unique. Many tribes have opted to adopt their own ordinances and codes to protect Indian people with disabilities within the tribal system.

Rural Transportation: Most tribal lands are located in rural and remote areas of the United States and lack public transportation systems, which could provide people with disabilities with access to transportation and increased independence.

Rural Infrastructure: Tribal communities may not have the infrastructure to support access and accommodation for people with disabilities, such as sidewalks and sidewalk ramps for wheelchair access. Tribal communities may lack access to high-speed Internet or the means to acquire assistive technology for people with disabilities.

Public Access: Tribal and federal office buildings that serve the community are not always accessible for people with disabilities. Some tribes may lack the resources to retrofit their buildings to accommodate people with disabilities.

Complex Federal Programs: There are a variety of federal and state programs that can be important resources for people with disabilities on tribal lands. These programs may have overlapping or conflicting responsibilities and must be navigated with dogged determination. Don't take "no" for an answer.

State Relationships: Relationships between tribes and states can be strained because of overlapping or conflicting jurisdictions and other issues. States may offer many services and programs that can be helpful for people with disabilities and their families living in Indian country. It is important to remember that while tribes are sovereign governments, their members are also citizens of the state and of the United States and are entitled to access state programs.

Education Systems: The majority of AI/AN children are educated through the public school systems in each state. The balance of Indian children are educated in tribally operated schools or federal schools run by BIA. As a result, a variety of entities may have some level of responsibility for children with disabilities in our schools (Pavel, 1995). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires public schools and BIA to provide children with disabilities with a free appropriate education based upon an Individualized Education Program for each child. This is the law. Parents of Indian children with disabilities may not be aware of the services and support their children are entitled to receive and may not know how to advocate for their children effectively.

Employment: Federally recognized Indian tribes are specifically exempt as employers under Title I of ADA, which prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in employment and requires that employers make reasonable accommodation for employees with disabilities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.). This exemption is a barrier for Indians with disabilities in Indian country, particularly in rural areas where tribal governments are the largest employer. Some tribal governments have voluntarily complied with ADA or adopted their own codes to protect people with disabilities from employment discrimination.

Housing: Homes are not generally designed to meet the needs of people with disabilities. There is limited funding at the tribal level to cover the cost of retrofitting tribal or private housing. This housing barrier can mean the difference between an individual with disabilities living independently or living under the care of others. Every home should have some means for "visitability" for people with disabilities.

Service Coordination and Advocacy: Indian people with disabilities do not always have a central location where services are coordinated within tribal settings. This can present a major barrier, particularly for individuals with disabilities who have multiple needs, such as housing, health care, vocational rehabilitation, and advocacy.

Personal Care Assistance: Just getting out of bed, bathed, dressed, and out of the house could present major barriers for some people with disabilities. Yet, with the support of a personal care attendant, many people with disabilities have been able to demonstrate their value as members of the tribal workforce. Much more can be done in Indian communities to provide home- and community-based services.

References

American Indian Disability Legislation Project (AIDLP) Research and Training Center on Rural Rehabilitation Rural Institute on Disabilities. (2000). Missoula: University of Montana Rural Institute.

Clay, Julie. (1992). A profile of independent living services for American Indians with disabilities living on reservations. Missoula: University of Montana Rural Institute.

Langwell, Kathy, and Janet Sutton. (2002). People with disabilities on tribal lands: Education, health, rehabilitation, and independent living literature review. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability.

McNeil, J. (2001). Americans with Disabilities 1997. Current Population Reports: U.S. Census Bureau.

National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research (NCDDR). (1999). A review of the literature on topics related to increasing the utilization of rehabilitation research outcomes among diverse consumer groups. Retrieved November 4, 2002, from www.ncddr.org/du/products/dddreview/toc.html.

National Resource Center on Native American Aging (NRCNAA). (2002). Functional Limitations and the Future Needs for Long Term Care. Grand Forks: University of North Dakota.

Ogunwole, Stella U. (2002). The American Indian and Alaska Native population: 2000. Census 2000 Brief: U.S. Census Bureau, 1.

Pavel, D. Michael. (1995). Comparing BIA and tribal schools with public schools: A look at the year 1990-91. Journal of American Indian Education 35(1).

Rural Institute on Disabilities. (1995). American Indians and Disability. Rural Facts, 2.

Healthy Living

Background

Healthy living expands the scope of health care by integrating a wellness approach, including sport and recreation activities. Wellness involves the mind, body, spirit, and context of the individual. Many Native American cultures emphasize harmony between mind, body, spirit, and one's relationship with one's community and the environment. In this way, today's health and wellness model may be highly compatible with the values of tribal members with disabilities.

Today's wellness model focuses on the optimal functioning of individuals regardless of disability or health status. Wellness spans a continuum that is unique to each individual and his or her context-a context composed of environmental factors such as culture, community, family, social networks, social history, and physical environment. More specifically, health and wellness may be measured in the following ways: the ability to function and have the option to do what one wishes; being independent and having self-determination with regard to choices, opportunities, and activities; having physical and emotional states of well-being; and not being held back by pain. Individual factors relating to health and wellness are

  • Pain management
  • Rest
  • Exercise
  • Nutrition
  • Weight
  • Skin care
  • Medication
  • Bodily functioning
  • Sexuality
  • Aging
  • Attitude
  • Identity
  • Beliefs
  • Self-determination
  • Social contribution
  • Consumer knowledge
  • Personal growth and development
  • Health management
  • Social support
  • Employment
  • School
  • Accessibility accommodation
  • Personal assistant services
  • Housing
  • Transportation
  • Knowledge and sensitivity of others, including health care providers
  • Alternative/complementary medicine

Thus, individuals define their own wellness, which is based on individual circumstances and viewed holistically (ILRU, 2002).

The following section will describe the health or medical care support available for individuals with disabilities living in Indian country as well as provide an overview of the recreation and sport opportunities that also exist.

Health Care

People with disabilities depend upon health care systems to provide high-quality health services in accessible and appropriate settings. All Indian Health Service (IHS) and tribal health care facilities should be accessible for patients with mobility, sensory, or cognitive disabilities. Patients with hearing and visual disabilities should be able to access and communicate with their health care provider systems. Ramps, doorways, exam rooms, and restrooms must be accessible. Staff should be trained and prepared to effectively serve people with disabilities in the clinic.

IHS and tribal health care providers should review their health care system to ensure that the challenges faced by many Indians with disabilities are addressed and considered.

Resources to meet the health care needs of Indians with disabilities are available through several existing programs. These programs are described below. Many of these programs can be used in combination with each other to provide an array of services most beneficial for the patient.

IHS and tribal health care programs can seek certification to bill for many services paid for by Medicaid, Medicare, or State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and provide these services directly to patients in the clinics or through a home- and community-based services (HCBS) model. This is important for patients with disabilities who may require long-term care services.

Indian Health Service

AI/AN people have a unique relationship with the Federal Government. This relationship stems from Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution and is affirmed through numerous treaties, federal laws, Supreme Court decisions, and executive orders. A significant component of this relationship is the Federal Government's responsibility to provide health care services to Indian people.

The Federal Government carries out this responsibility through IHS, an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). IHS is the primary health provider and health advocate for AI/AN people, and its goal is to raise their health status to the highest possible level. Unfortunately, IHS funding is never adequate for the challenge, and services are often rationed at the local level.

IHS is composed of 12 regional administrative offices known as Area Offices. Within each of these Area Offices, locally administered Service Units coordinate health services for tribal beneficiaries. Across the United States there are over 151 individual Service Units. Some Service Units are administered by the Federal Government, and some have been contracted by tribes, under the Indian Self-Determination Act (PL 83-638).

There are no "guaranteed benefits" for IHS patients. Services vary from one IHS/tribal clinic, health station, or hospital to the next. You must check with your local IHS or tribal health program to know which services are available. Services could include

  • Outpatient medical services
  • Inpatient hospital or specialty services (direct or referral)
  • Dental services
  • Mental health services
  • Pharmacy and laboratory services
  • Home nursing visits
  • Community health representative visits
  • Transportation

Eligibility for IHS Direct Services: To be eligible for "direct services" provided by the IHS directly or by a tribe, which administers services on behalf of the IHS, a person must be a member or a descendant of a federally recognized tribe. To be recognized as a descendant, an individual must show that he/she

  • Is regarded by the community in which he/she lives as an Indian or Alaska Native;
  • Is a member, enrolled or otherwise of an Indian or Alaska Native tribe or group under federal supervision;
  • Resides on tax-exempt land or owns restricted property;
  • Actively participates in tribal affairs; or
  • Has any other reasonable factor indicative of Indian descent. (IHS, 2002)

In addition, IHS allows Indians of Canadian or Mexican origin who are recognized by any Indian tribe or group as a member of an Indian community served by the Indian program to also be eligible for IHS services. In certain cases, non-Indians can also be eligible for IHS services: for instance, a non-Indian woman who is pregnant with an eligible Indian's child or, in cases of public health hazard or acute infectious diseases, a non-Indian member of an eligible Indian's household.

Eligibility for IHS Contract Health Services (CHS): In cases where IHS or a tribal facility cannot provide within its own facility certain inpatient or specialty medical services, IHS can refer a patient to an outside or private provider. In these cases, the private provider or hospital will bill IHS for services to the patient. Due to limited funding, eligibility requirements for CHS are stricter than for services provided at an IHS or tribal facility. IHS/CHS eligibility requires that the IHS eligible patient also reside within a defined Service Delivery Area, which usually includes the counties overlapping or bordering the tribal reservation. It is important to note that prior approval from the IHS or tribal clinic is required for each CHS eligible service visit. Close coordination with the IHS or tribal clinic is required to effectively utilize CHS services.

How do I enroll? Your first visit should be with the IHS or tribal health clinic to register as a patient. You might be asked to name your tribe of enrollment or the tribe from which you descend on the registration form. In some cases, you might be asked to show your tribal identification card. For more information you can visit the IHS Web site at www.ihs.gov.

Medicaid

Medicaid is a federal program administered by the states. It was enacted in 1965 to pay for medical care for certain individuals with low income or lack of resources. For Indian and Alaska Native communities, it can help fill the gap in providing resources that might not be available through the IHS. It is also important to know that the IHS or tribal health clinic can bill Medicaid for services provided to Indian patients who are enrolled in Medicaid. This helps your local Indian clinic expand services.

Am I eligible? States decide who is covered, how providers get paid, and what services are covered under Medicaid. Eligibility can vary from state to state. At a minimum, the Federal Government requires states to cover

  • Families with children who meet the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) requirements in place on July 16, 1996 (former AFCD program)
  • Poverty-level pregnant women and children
  • People with disabilities who are enrolled in SSI

If an Indian or Alaska Native is enrolled in Medicaid, that program is required to pay for services before the IHS pays. Courts have determined that IHS is the "payer of last resort." States cannot restrict Medicaid eligibility based on medical condition, type of services needed, or place of residence.

Financial eligibility for Medicaid will be determined upon a review of income and resources. Most states use Supplemental Security Income (SSI) as the basis for determining financial eligibility, while some states develop their own formula to determine income and resources (Dixon, 2002).

What services are covered under Medicaid? Unlike IHS, Medicaid programs have a "defined benefits package" that each enrollee is entitled to receive. You can get these services at your local IHS clinic or at another clinic or facility. These packages vary from state to state, and some states might require a nominal co-payment by the patient for certain services.

Medicaid Mandated Services (states must cover):

  • Inpatient hospital services
  • Outpatient hospital services
  • Physician services
  • Nursing facility services for individuals age 21 and older
  • Home health services for anyone entitled to nursing facility care
  • Early and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment (for persons under age 21)
  • Nurse-midwife services
  • Family planning services
  • Pediatric or family nurse practitioner services
  • Other laboratory and X-ray services
  • Dental services that would be covered if performed by a physician
  • Intermediate care facility for mentally retarded
  • Doctor of osteopath services for children under age 21 and pregnant women

Medicaid Optional Services (states can opt to cover):

  • Nursing facility services for persons under age 21
  • Home- and community-based services
  • Hospice services
  • Chiropractic services
  • Private-duty nursing services
  • Dental services
  • Physical therapy
  • Occupational therapy
  • Services for people with speech, hearing, and language disorders
  • Prescription drugs
  • Prosthetic devices
  • Eyeglasses
  • Diagnostic, screening, prevention, and rehabilitation services
  • Personal care services
  • Pediatric immunizations
  • Tuberculosis-related services
  • Transportation
  • Targeted case management services
  • Institution for mental disease for individuals age 65 and over
  • Inpatient psychiatric services for individuals under age 21

Making Medicaid Work for People with Disabilities: It is important to check with your state or local Medicaid Agency to see which services are covered. The Federal Government requires that home health services be provided if authorized by a physician. Services could include nursing, home health aides, medical supplies, medical equipment, and appliances suitable for use in the home (Dixon, 2002). Further, states can opt to expand this list to include personal care services, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, audiology, rehabilitation, private-duty nursing, and transportation.

How do I enroll? Many IHS or tribal health clinics have business office staff or benefits coordinators who will help you fill out the necessary forms to apply for Medicaid enrollment. You can also go directly to your local, county, or state Medicaid office to apply.

Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services (HCBS)

We used to think of long-term care as nursing home care. While nursing home care can be appropriate for some individuals, it is no longer the only option. In 1981, federal law was amended to allow state Medicaid programs to include HCBS waivers (Social Security Act, Sect. 1915(c)). Today, all 50 states have implemented some type of HCBS waiver as an alternative to institutionalizing the elderly and people with disabilities.

The move to support de-institutionalizing people requiring long-term care received an important boost from the U.S. Supreme Court in 1999, when it ruled in Olmstead v L.C. (527 U.S. 581) that Title II of ADA requires states to provide community-based treatment for persons with mental disabilities when the providers determine that institutional care is inappropriate. The practical effect has been that states must now provide the "least restrictive care" for people with disabilities.

What can tribes do? Tribal health programs should review their state HCBS plans to see how tribally administered home- and community-based services can be paid through Medicaid reimbursement. In addition to the medical services offered by state Medicaid programs, states can also opt, by waiver, to provide case management, homemaker, home health aide, personal care, adult day health services, habilitation, respite care, and other related services. HCBS waiver programs may also provide services designed to foster independence, train family caregivers, and enable the individual to stay at home.

Who is most at risk for institutionalization? Unfortunately, the misuse of nursing homes, unnecessary physical restraints, and excessive referrals to large institutions has been a problem in communities across the United States for our elderly and people with severe disabilities (Shapiro, 1994). Those most at risk include the elderly, technology-dependent children, persons with traumatic brain injuries, persons with mental retardation or developmental disabilities, Alzheimer's patients, and others with severe disabilities (CMS, 2001).

Special Provisions for Children: Medicaid's Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program serves as Medicaid's well-child program, providing regular screening, immunizations, and access to care. When a problem is identified, EPSDT is used to confirm the diagnosis and cover appropriate treatment. EPSDT pays for the services. A state's HCBS waiver program can be used to provide Medicaid eligibility to children whose parents' income and resources exceed the usual thresholds. Such a waiver allows states to provide care at home or in their communities to children who would otherwise be eligible for Medicaid only if they were institutionalized. States try to coordinate their HCBS and their EPSDT programs to look out for the best interests of the child and to make sure their special needs are met (CMS, 2001).

Medicare

Medicare is a federal program administered by the Federal Government though the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare provides federal "health insurance" for hospital care (Part A) and medical care (Part B). In both programs, there can be some level of deductibles and co-insurance that must be paid by the patient. Medicare also provides preventive care benefits, including flu shots, mammogram screening, women's health screening, diabetes education, colorectal cancer screening, bone mass testing, and prostate test screening.

Part A coverage includes

  • Hospital care
  • Skilled nursing facility care
  • Home health care
  • Hospice care

Part B coverage includes

  • Physician services
  • Durable medical equipment
  • Kidney dialysis and kidney transplants
  • Outpatient hospital services
  • X-rays and laboratory tests
  • Limited ambulance benefits

Medicare does not generally cover costs associated with long-term care. The number of days of continuous care is limited under Medicare. Long-term care is generally covered by Medicaid.

Am I eligible for Medicare? Medicare provides coverage for certain types of health care services for the following groups of people:

  • People age 65 or older
  • Some people with disabilities (if receiving Social Security disability benefits for 24 months prior)
  • People with end-stage renal disease (permanent kidney failure requiring dialysis or transplant)

If you are a person with disabilities and are under 65, and you have been entitled to Social Security disability benefits for at least two years, you will be automatically entitled to Medicare Part A beginning the 25th month of disability benefit entitlement.

How do I enroll? The Social Security Administration handles Medicare eligibility and enrollment. You can contact the Social Security Administration at 1-800-772-1213 to enroll in Medicare or to ask questions about your eligibility. You can visit their Web site at www.ssa.gov or at www.medicare.gov.

State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)

SCHIP was established by the Federal Government and is administered by the states, much like the Medicaid program. It is intended to be more flexible than the Medicaid program, but this varies from state to state. Some states will use their SCHIP dollars simply to expand their Medicaid program. Other states have established a stand-alone SCHIP program that targets children who might not be eligible for Medicaid but who still lack health insurance because of low income. You need to check with your local, county, or state health offices and ask about SCHIP coverage to know what is available in your state. Remember, federal law prohibits states from charging co-payments for SCHIP coverage to Native American children enrolled in the program. States are allowed to charge co-payments for SCHIP coverage, but not to Indian children.

Am I eligible for SCHIP? Your child or children might be eligible for SCHIP. Some states allow the entire family to be covered; most states cover only the children (www.cms.gov). The program is for children who do not currently have health insurance (IHS is not considered health insurance). Even if you are working, your child might still be eligible. Most states insure children up to 18 years old whose families earn up to $34,100 a year (for a family of four).

How do I enroll? You should contact your local IHS or tribal clinic to see if they will help you enroll your child or children in SCHIP. Remember, Indian children have no co-payment requirements under this program. You can also contact your local county or state health offices to enroll in SCHIP. For more information, see the SCHIP Web site at www.cms.gov/schip/.

Sports and Recreation

Many options are available for people with disabilities with regard to recreation and sports. Community trips to movies and theater, spectator sports, sightseeing tours, museums, concerts, shopping, restaurants, and clubs help individuals with disabilities problem-solve, transfer therapy skills, and cope with real-life situations, especially as part of a rehabilitation program. Camps and camping are also important and popular forms of recreation for people with disabilities, and many organizations have camps designed for the special needs of people with disabilities. Sporting activities and organizations for people with disabilities include the following:

  • Aquatics
  • Archery
  • Aviation
  • Badminton
  • Baseball
  • Basketball
  • Billiards
  • Boccia
  • Bowhunting
  • Bowling
  • Cycling
  • Dance sport
  • Fencing
  • Fishing
  • Goalball
  • Golf
  • Gymnastics
  • Handball
  • Hockey (floor, ice, ice sledge, sledge, and sled)
  • Horseback riding
  • Hunting
  • Lawn bowling
  • Martial arts
  • Orienteering
  • Power

As for sports programs, national, community, high school, and collegiate sports programs are primarily designed for people without disabilities. However, people with disabilities are frequently integrated into these "conventional" sports programs. There are advantages to integration as these programs usually have better coaching, better facilities, and more intensive training for their participants. In fact, ADA requires that community programs be accessible to people with disabilities, and IDEA requires that public school intramural and interscholastic sports programs be available to individuals with disabilities (Disability Sports, 2001b).

In 2001, HHS made increasing the number of physically active individuals with disabilities a public health priority. Research indicates that the benefits for anyone engaged in regular exercise (3 or more days per week for 20 or more minutes) are as follows:

  • Physiological and psychological benefit
  • Increased health-related physical fitness such as cardiovascular endurance, muscle strength, muscle endurance, and flexibility
  • Weight control and the prevention of obesity and other health-related conditions
  • Psychological benefits such as decreased anxiety and depression with improvements in emotions, self-esteem, and self-confidence (ILRU, 2001)

For people with disabilities, especially those with spinal cord injuries, vigorous physical exercise and sports (e.g., wheelchair sports such as basketball, bowling, track and field, swimming, archery, table tennis, softball, football, marathons, and rugby) are highly beneficial for

  • Stimulating circulation
  • Helping to prevent skin breakdown
  • Increasing fluid intake
  • Promoting self-worth and mental health
  • Improving the immune system and overall health
  • Reconnecting with the past and supporting a patient's construction of an identity following the injury
  • Enhancing physical performance and inducing positive physiological adaptations
  • Increasing community integration (PoinTIS, 2002)

Unfortunately, people with disabilities wishing to participate in sports are faced with numerous barriers:

  • Sometimes people with disabilities find it difficult to believe in their abilities and to view themselves as athletes.
  • Acceptance by teammates, coaches, officials, and sports administrators usually must be earned through performance, sportsmanship, and work ethic. A positive example from a team coach can help in this area.
  • Access to quality coaching, programs, sports sciences services, and accessibility can be difficult. Many coaches and program directors still find difficulty in viewing athletes with a disability as deserving of attention and expertise.
  • Athletes with disabilities frequently experience greater financial burdens associated with sports participation than nondisabled athletes because of increased costs associated with specialized equipment, personal assistance, insurance, and travel. (Disability Sports, 2002)

For tribal members with disabilities living on reservations, these barriers can seem insurmountable. However, organizations and resources are available to tribal members with disabilities who wish to participate in sports and recreational activities. In addition, tribal members with disabilities can also contact the nearest independent living center (ILC) for sports and recreation opportunities.

References

Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). (2001). Fact Sheet: Home and Community Based Services. Washington, DC: CMS.

Disability Sports. (2002). Barriers to participation. Retrieved October 21, 2002, from
http://ed-Web3.educ.msu.edu/kin866/issbarrier.htm.

Disability Sports. (2001b). Inclusion in "regular" sports programs. Retrieved October 21, 2002, from
http://ed-Web3.educ.msu.edu/kin866/orgregular.htm.

Dixon, Mim. (2002). Opportunities for Medicaid financing of long term care in American Indian and Alaska Native communities. American Indian and Alaska Native Roundtable on Long Term Care: Final Report. Indian Health Service, 26.

Independent Living Research Utilization (ILRU) at TIRR. (2002). Definitions of health & wellness. Retrieved October 18, 2002, from www.ilru.org/healthwellness/healthinfo/wellness-definition.html.

Independent Living Research Utilization (ILRU) at TIRR. (2001). Physical activity, motivation and people with disabilities. Retrieved October 18, 2002, from
www.ilru.org/online/handouts/2001/Kosma/motivating.html.

Indian Health Service (IHS). (2002) Eligibility requirements for health services from the Indian Health Service. Retrieved November 4, 2002, from
www.ihs.gov/GeneralWeb/HelpCenter/CustomerServices/elig.asp.

PoinTIS Spinal Cord Injury Recreational Therapy. (2002). Recreational activities: Community trips, sports, independent living. Retrieved October 18, 2002, from
http://calder.med.miami.edu/providers/RECREATIONAL/rec2.html.

Shapiro, Joseph P. (1994). No Pity. New York: Times Books.

Education

Background

"There are approximately 500,000 American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) students attending K-12 schools in the United States. Of the 500,000 AI/AN students, the majority (approximately 90 percent) attend public schools. The remaining 10 percent attend schools operated or funded by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and Tribes" (Faircloth and Tippeconnic, 2000, p. 1). The Twenty-second Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (U.S. ED, 2000) reports that "American Indian students represent 1.0 percent of the general population and 1.3 percent of special education students. American Indian students slightly exceeded the national average in nine disability categories, reaching the largest percentages in the categories of deaf-blindness (1.8 percent) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) (1.6 percent)." These statistics suggest that AI/AN students are slightly over-represented in the special education population (Faircloth and Tippeconic, 2000).

For centuries now, educating Indian children has been a primary focus of government agencies and tribes. Boarding schools and other public education institutions have significantly affected the Indian community and how we look at education. The education of AI/AN children has reached crisis proportions as reflected in national and state data trends. So what happens to children with disabilities living in Indian country? What resources are available to children and parents?

The following section is designed to assist you by outlining federal education laws, by providing practical tips for parents, and by providing resources for technical assistance and protection.

Federal Special Education Law

On January 8, 2002, the federal law No Child Left Behind was signed by the President of the United States. This law holds educators, elected officials, policymakers, and parents accountable in an attempt to close the academic achievement gap between high- and low-performing students. The No Child Left Behind law allows parents to become involved in the development of district policies and plans for their child's education. Parents and community leaders can participate in school improvement efforts. This new law affects every school district in the country (Public Education Network, 2003). This law is especially important for rural, isolated schools such as those serving AI/AN children living on or near Indian country. Too many children are being left behind, and AI/AN children have historically fallen way below the national average in academic achievement compared with non-Indian children.

No Child Left Behind, in concert with IDEA, the federal special education law, can provide parents with new tools to ensure that their child's special education needs are being met. The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) administers IDEA, which guides the entire special education process. Special education programs follow rules and regulations set by federal and state governments. IDEA is implemented locally in all parts of the United States. As part of this law, OSEP of the U.S. Department of Education is responsible for meeting with each state and U.S. entity, including BIA, the Office of Indian Education Programs, and the Branch of Exceptional Education to ensure that the requirements of the law are being adequately met. Special education services in your area must meet these federal as well as local and state IDEA regulations (FAPE, 2002). The Act is authorized through 2002; the reauthorization process will be taken up in early 2003.

Individualized Education Programs

IDEA requires public school systems and BIA-funded schools to develop appropriate Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) for each child. The specific special education and related services outlined in each IEP reflect the individualized needs of each student. IDEA also mandates that particular procedures be followed in the development of the IEP. Each student's IEP must be developed by a team of knowledgeable persons and must be at least reviewed annually. The team includes the child's teacher; the parents (subject to certain limited exceptions); the child (if determined appropriate); an agency representative who is qualified to provide or supervise the provision of special education; and other individuals at the parents' or agency's discretion (DOJ, 2001).

Tips for Parents at IEP Meetings

The Arizona Center for Disability Law's Client Assistance Program (2002) offers both the tips and checklist that follow for parents who are working with their child's school to create an IEP that meets the unique needs of their child.

In arranging IEP meetings, you should remember the following:

  • You or the school can ask that an IEP meeting be scheduled.
  • Meetings to plan or review your child's IEP should be held when you can attend.
  • If you cannot attend a meeting that has been scheduled, call the school immediately and ask that the meeting be rescheduled.
  • The notice of the meeting should state the purpose, date/time, location, and participants of the meeting.
  • Ask for an interpreter, if needed.

Prior to the IEP meeting you may prepare by doing the following:

  • Set up an appointment to go to the school to review your child's school records.
  • Ask for a copy of a blank IEP form so that you know what will be discussed.
  • Get a copy of the school's proposed IEP, if one has been prepared.
  • Get information and help from other parents or advocacy groups.
  • Make a list of questions and comments to take to the meeting.

At the meeting you can be an effective team member in the following ways:

  • By participating by a telephone call or a letter, if you cannot attend the meeting.
  • By reminding the school, if necessary, that you will not sign a prepared IEP but wish to be involved in writing the IEP.
  • By asking questions and sharing knowledge about your child with the team.
  • By remembering that you may tape-record the meeting.
  • By remembering that you may bring another parent, interested professional, or trained advocate with you.
  • By knowing your child's rights and discussing these rights with the team.

At the close of the meeting

  • Be certain that you understand your child's IEP. If you don't understand the IEP, ask the school to explain the services.
  • Obtain a copy of the IEP.
  • Though you should try to cooperate with the school, do not sign the IEP if it does not meet your child's needs.
  • Request a due process hearing if you do not agree with the plan offered by the school (contact an advocate before requesting the hearing).
  • Remember that the IEPs should be reviewed at least once per year.

IEP Checklist

Your child's IEP should contain all of the following:

  • Information about the child's strengths and needs
  • Measurable annual goals
  • Short-term instructional objectives (short teaching steps that the team develops to allow each student to reach his/her annual goals)
  • Services to be provided (including any related services needed to benefit from the school program such as transportation, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, counseling, psychological services, or interpreter)
  • Date each service will begin and end
  • How progress will be measured
  • Progress reports as often as children without disabilities receive them
  • An explanation of the extent, if any, to which the child will not participate with nondisabled children in the regular classroom
  • Transition services planning (beginning no later than age 14)
  • Transition services programming (beginning no later than age 16) (Arizona Center for Disability Law, 2001)

Problem Solving

IDEA has procedures in place to allow any member of the child's IEP team to bring a problem to the attention of team members. The student's parents are given rights and protections called procedural safeguards. These rights allow parents to question decisions made by the school regarding their children's education (DOJ, 2001).

When disputes arise, IDEA favors solving the problem by both parties through a process called mediation (FAPE, 2002). The Consortium for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special Education (CADRE) is such an alternative that is funded by the U.S. Department of Education. CADRE encourages the use of mediation and other collaborative strategies to resolve disagreements about special education and early intervention programs. CADRE uses advanced technology as well as traditional means to provide technical assistance to state departments of education on implementation of the mediation requirements under IDEA '97. CADRE also helps parents, educators, and administrators benefit from the full continuum of dispute resolution options that can prevent and resolve conflict and ultimately lead to informed partnerships that focus on results for children and youth (CADRE, 2002).

For a more detailed description of due process and complaint process guarantees provided for AI/AN children and families under IDEA, please refer to the Federal Disability Law and Tribes section of the Toolkit.

Office of Special Education Programs

OSEP has developed five strategic directions designed to improve education results for students with disabilities (OSEP, 2002). These directions are based on research and outreach that focused on what is currently working for students, parents, teachers, and schools. These directions are also closely tied to the IDEA legislation. OSEP was in fact the sponsor of the research that preceded the legislation. The following descriptions of the strategic directions and the brief information about the projects, publications, technical assistance centers, and clearinghouses are quoted directly from the U.S. Department of Education's Web site in order to provide you with the most complete information possible. More detailed information can also be obtained by contacting OSEP directly:

Strategic Direction 1: Infants, Toddlers, and Their Families Receive the Supports They Need

The first weeks and months of an infant's life can significantly affect all aspects of his/her entire life, including success in school. Data and anecdotal information indicate that families all across the country often are not informed early enough about the importance of early intervention. Too often children with significant disabilities may be 2 or 3 years old before they are referred for assessment and early intervention. Schools have a great stake in early identification and service provision for all eligible infants and toddlers and their families. Relevant state agencies must develop strong interagency partnerships to ensure a continuous, effective campaign to identify children in need of early intervention.

It is also equally important that our youngest children and their families receive services and supports in natural environments. Services provided in the home, childcare, or other community-based settings are reporting positive responses from families and the early childhood community. Moreover, children who start off in settings with their peers who don't have disabilities are more likely to be included throughout their school years.

IDEAs That Work for Infants and Toddlers

Project: "Supporting Neurobehavioral Organizational Development in Infants With Disabilities: The Neurobehavioral Curriculum for Early Intervention"
Phone: (206) 285-9317
E-mail: mgallien@halcyon.com; anotari@wri-edu.org
The goal of this project is to provide curriculum for parents and professionals so that they can support the neurobehavioral organization of infants born with very low birth weight or with severe disabilities.

Project: Circle of Inclusion Web Site
Web site: www.circleofinclusion.org/
This Web site offers demonstrations and information about the effective practices of inclusive educational programs for children with disabilities (birth through age eight).

Technical Assistance Center: National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System (NECTAS)
Phone: (919) 962-2001
TTY/TDD: (919) 962-8300
Web site: www.nectas.unc.edu

Technical Assistance Center: Technical Assistance Alliance for Parent Centers - The Alliance.
Phone: (888) 248-0822
TTY/TDD: (612) 827-7770.
Web site: www.taalliance.org

Strategic Direction 2: Preschool Programs That Prepare Children with Disabilities for Elementary School Success

In 1986, half as many children attended preschool programs as today and only 24 states participated in the preschool program. Today all states have a preschool program for children with disabilities. It is not good enough just to offer the child a program. The program must be rigorous and prepare children for success in school. OSEP supported a study with the National Academy of Sciences on preventing reading failure in young children. This study showed that a rich preschool program can make a difference. It is also important that in those programs children have opportunities to have an integrated experience with their nondisabled peers. We must make sure that our preschool programs are preparing children to be successful in the primary grades.

IDEAs That Work for Preschool Children

Project: Reaching Individuals with Disabilities Early (RIDE Project)
Web site: www.ovec.org/ride/Home/index.htm
RIDE is a model demonstration project with the goals of

    1. Enhancing child-find efforts in targeted school districts by distributing multifaceted awareness packages and

    2. Helping school districts to develop local capacity in the delivery of assistive technology services, by providing an intensive training program.

Project: Language Is the Key
Web site: www.wri-edu.org/bookplay
A video-training program designed to address the needs of professionals and paraprofessionals who work with young children with language disorders.

Publication: Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children
Web site: www.nap.edu

Technical Assistance Center: National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System (NECTAS)
Phone: (919) 962-2001
TTY: (919) 962-8300
Web site: www.nectas.unc.edu

Strategic Direction 3: Effective Intervention for Young Students with Reading or Behavior Difficulties

The importance and effectiveness of strategies that intervene early in a child's development are well recognized in improving results for children with disabilities. Unfortunately, approximately 60 percent of the children currently being served under IDEA are typically identified too late to receive full benefit from such interventions. This problem is most prominent with two specific populations of children: those identified for special education and related services under the categories "specific learning disabilities" and "emotional disturbance." These children are often not identified as being eligible for special education and related services until after their disabilities have reached significant proportions. These are children who very early in their education experience marked difficulties learning to read or exhibit behaviors that lead to discipline problems as they get older.

A body of research on the topic tells us how to assess, identify, and help these children. For instance, research indicates that

  • Both populations of children can be assessed and identified early and with relative ease and accuracy;
  • Both populations of children, based on the nature of their disabilities, are at high risk for dropping out of school, becoming discipline problems, and for failing in school;
  • Both populations of children need valuable time that is essential to learning, time often lost because these children do not receive appropriate services earlier; and
  • Both populations can make tremendous gains when provided with effective services during early childhood.

In practice, however, schools and teachers simply are not prepared to implement effective research-based practices to meet the needs of these children. We must join with our general education partners to ensure that all children experiencing early reading or behavior difficulties receive the services they need.

IDEAs That Work for Children with Reading or Behavioral Difficulties

Budget Request: The President has proposed, for the fiscal year 2000 budget, a $50 million dollar initiative called PRIME TIME: Reading and Behavior Initiative that will support demonstrations of school-based models of effective programs and practices to serve children who have marked difficulty learning to read and/or who exhibit behaviors that lead to discipline problems as they get older.

Project: National Center on Accelerating Student Learning (CASL)
Phone: (615) 343-4782
E-mail: lynn.fuchs@vanderbilt.edu; doug.fuchs@vanderbilt.edu
Promoting success in reading, writing, and math in grades K-3. CASL is a five-year research effort designed to accelerate learning for students with disabilities.

Publication: "Early Warning, Timely Response; A Guide to Safe Schools"
Phone: (877) 4ED-PUBS
Web site: www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/OSEP/earlywrn.html

Technical Assistance Center: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice (CECP)
Phone: (202) 944-5454
Web site: www.air-dc.org/cecp/default.htm

Technical Assistance Center: Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support
Phone: (541) 346-3560
E-mail: PBIS@oregon.uoregon.edu.

Strategic Direction 4: Appropriate Access to the General Education Curriculum

It is critically important that children with disabilities have access to the same curriculum that other children have if they are going to become successful adults. Simply put, children with disabilities should be learning what other children are learning in school and schools should be held accountable for results. Current research indicates that a large number of children with disabilities are not learning the same things in school as other children and therefore are not going to be in a position to graduate from high school or to be successful in life. The IDEA '97 amendments provide access to the general curriculum by requiring that states include students with disabilities in nationwide assessments. It is important that we manage our programs based on the results of these assessments.

IDEAs That Work to Ensure Access to the General Education Curriculum

Project: Performance Assessment and Standardized Testing for Students with Disabilities: Psychometric Issues, Accommodation Procedures, and Outcome Analysis
Web site: www.wcer.wisc.edu/

This project focuses on how fourth- and eighth-grade students with and without disabilities function on math and science assessments.

Publication: "A Curriculum Every Student Can Use: Design Principles for Student Access"
Web site: http://ericec.org/osep-sp.html
Published by the OSEP-sponsored ERIC/OSEP Special Project; ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education

Technical Assistance Center: National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
Phone: (612) 626-1530
Web site: www.coled.umn.edu/nceo/

Technical Assistance Center: The National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators (NCITE)
Phone: (541) 686-5060
Web site: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~ncite/index.html

Technical Assistance Center: The Parents Engaged in Educational Reform Project (PEER)
Phone: (617) 482-2915
Web site: www.fcsn.org/peer/

Technical Assistance Center: Consortium on Inclusive Schooling Practices (CISP)
Phone: (412) 359-1600
Web site: www.pgh.auhs.edu/CISP/

Technical Assistance Center: National Institute for Urban School Improvement
Phone: (303) 620-4074
TTY/TDD: (703) 519-7008
E-mail: Elizabeth_Kozleski@ceo.cudenver.edu

Strategic Direction 5: All Students with Disabilities Complete High School

Despite recent U.S. Department of Education reports of improvement data, for a number of years, national statistics have indicated that students with disabilities drop out of school at a higher rate than nondisabled students do, and if they stay in school, often complete their program without a standard diploma. This is still the case in Indian country. We need to be committed to graduating special education students with diplomas that represent the attainment of skills and knowledge necessary to succeed in adult life. We need to remember that higher education and lifelong learning are stepping stones for everyone. We also have to recognize that education and employment go hand in hand. We need to prepare our students to earn their way to success. OSEP-sponsored research has shown that monitoring students, building adult-student relationships, increasing the student's connection to school, and improving student problem-solving skills, along with ensuring access to general and vocational curricula, all play a part in increasing a student's chances of successful high school completion.

IDEAs That Work to Help Students with Disabilities Complete High School

Project: The National Transition Alliance (NTA)
Web site: www.dssc.org/nta/
NTA has identified over 25 promising programs from across the country addressing dropout prevention. A database of these programs is at the Web site above. Use the search term "dropout." The NTA's purpose is to promote the transition of youth with disabilities toward desired post-school experiences.

Project: "Building Responsive High School Special Education Programs"
Web site: www.ced.appstate.edu/projects/special_ed
This project is working in two high schools to improve the outcomes for students with disabilities who are at risk of dropping out.

Publication: "The ABC Dropout Prevention and Intervention Series"
Institute on Community Integration
Publications Office, University of Minnesota
150 Pillsbury Drive SE
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Phone: (612) 624-4512
A series of four booklets outlining effective dropout prevention and intervention strategies for middle school and beyond.

Technical Assistance Center: The National Transition Alliance for Youth with Disabilities (NTA)
Web site: www.dssc.org/nta/
Clearinghouse: The National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities
Web site: www.nichcy.org

Clearinghouse: HEATH Resource Center
Phone: (800) 544-3284 (voice, TTY)
Web site: www.acenet.edu/Programs/HEATH/home.html

OSEP-Sponsored Resources

IDEA authorizes formula grants to states and discretionary grants to institutions of higher education and other nonprofit organizations to support research, demonstrations, technical assistance and dissemination, technology and personnel development, and parent-training and information centers. These programs are intended to ensure that the rights of infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities and their parents are protected.

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue SW
Washington, DC 20202
Phone: (202) 205-5507
TTY/TDD: (202) 205-5637
Web site: www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/OSEP/index.html

IDEA Partnerships

OSEP funds four national projects, called IDEA Partnerships, to deliver a common message about the landmark 1997 reauthorization of IDEA. The IDEA Partnerships, working together for five years, inform professionals, families, and the public about IDEA '97 and strategies to improve educational results for children and youth with disabilities (IDEA Practices, 2002). The IDEA Partnerships include the following:

The Council for Exceptional Children

The Associations of Service Providers Implementing IDEA Reforms in Education (ASPIIRE)
1110 North Glebe Road, Suite 300
Arlington, VA 22201-5704
Phone: (877) CEC-IDEA
TTY/TDD: (866) 915-5000
Fax: (703) 264-1637
Web site: www.ideapractices.org

The ASPIIRE IDEA Partnership builds upon the strengths of 19 associations to assist practitioners in providing positive outcomes for students with disabilities. ASPIIRE utilizes collaboration to observe and learn from service providers in educational settings and translate needs into guidance, accurate resources, and training opportunities. Utilizing rapid-response systems with a vast information dissemination network, the ASPIIRE IDEA Partnership acts as a pivot point for distilling complex regulations into effective, research-based practices. The Partnership continually taps the strengths and expertise of its members.

The Families and Advocates Partnership for Education (FAPE)
Partnership at the PACER Center
816 Normandale Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55437-1044
Phone: (888) 248-0822
TTY/TDD: (952) 838-9000
Fax: (952) 838-0199
Web site: www.fape.org

The FAPE Partnership at PACER Center aims to inform and educate families and advocates about IDEA '97 and promising practices. The FAPE Partnership links families, advocates, and self-advocates to communication of the new focus of IDEA '97. The FAPE Partnership has developed family-friendly curricula and materials addressing the requirements of IDEA '97, positive behavioral supports, new research, and other issues of concern to families. These resources are also available in multiple languages through the FAPE Web site.

The Council for Exceptional Children
ILIAD IDEA Partnership
1110 North Glebe Road, Suite 300
Arlington, VA 22201-5704
Phone: (877) CEC-IDEA
TTY/TDD: (866) 915-5000
Fax: (703) 264-1637
Web site: ww.ideapractices.org

The ILIAD IDEA Partnership delivers support to the ongoing efforts of local education administrators and leaders. As the country continues to implement IDEA, the ILIAD Partnership brings together the preeminent educational leadership associations and builds upon their strengths and expertise. Together these groups interact to determine multiple vehicles for providing information, proven strategies, and technical assistance to school districts in urban, suburban, and rural areas.

The Policymaker Partnership (PMP) at the National Association of State Directors of Special Education
1800 Diagonal Road
Suite 320
Alexandria, VA 22314
Phone: (877) IDEA-INFO
Fax: (703) 519-3808
Web site: www.ideapolicy.org

PMP operates to increase the capacity of policymakers to act as informed change agents who are focused on improving educational outcomes for students with disabilities. The organizations that partner with PMP have profound influence in promoting excellence and equity for students with disabilities in the public education agenda.

Technical Assistance Alliance for Parent Centers

Parent Training Centers, funded by the U.S. Department of Education, are located all across the country. One example of these programs is the AI/AN Families Together Parent Training and Information Center, in Moscow, Idaho, which recruits and trains community members to provide support and assistance to families of AI/AN children with disabilities (NCD, 2002). Parent centers in each state provide training and information to parents of infants, toddlers, school-aged children, and young adults with disabilities and the professionals who work with their families. This assistance helps parents participate more effectively with professionals in meeting the educational needs of children and youth with disabilities. To reach the parent center in your state, you can contact the Technical Assistance Alliance for Parent Centers (the Alliance), which coordinates the delivery of technical assistance to the Parent Training Centers and the Community Parent Resource Centers through four regional centers located in California, New Hampshire, Texas, and Ohio.

Technical Assistance and Dissemination Network-Minorities

The Alliance Project for Tribal Colleges and Universities
PO Box 340
Wilmot, SD 57279
Phone: (800) 984-9406
Fax: (605) 938-4786
E-mail: jim@dailypost.com
Web site: www.alliance2k.org/introduction

The Alliance Project is funded by OSEP. The Project seeks to address the increasing demand for qualified personnel from historically under-represented groups in special education and related services. A major emphasis of the Alliance Project is to increase the success rate of special education and related services departments in acquiring grants from the OSEP Division of Personnel Preparation (DPP). The purpose of these grants is to prepare personnel in special education and related services to meet the demand for qualified professionals and to build institutional capacity.

Alliance engages in technical assistance and information services for the preparation of DPP grant proposals and for institutional development. Activities include grant writing workshops, mentoring, and best practice seminars. The Project works with faculty members in departments of general and special education, allied health and health sciences, school psychology, and counseling at historically Black colleges and universities, tribal colleges, and other institutions of higher education whose enrollment includes at least 25 percent of